Legal Opinion

State v. Sykes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1974No. 56PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s action in admitting over objection the following testimony of Officer Wood:

“I asked Mr. Sykes if he had been drinking and he said yes. I asked him to walk for me. As he was walking there on the driveway he was staggering. ... I gave the balance test and at the time I gave him this test he fell forward noticeably. I advised Mr. Sykes he was under arrest for driving under the influence. ...”

Defendant contends his incriminating statement was elicited by custodial interrogation before he had been advised of his constitutional rights as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. Alfred Earl HarflingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API