Legal Opinion

Oberholtzer v. Scranton

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1973No. Civ. A. Nos. 70-3310, 71-2769PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN MORGAN DAVIS, District Judge.

On March 14, 1973 I signed an Order which allowed certain defendants (Scranton, Butera, Quigley, Ryan, James, Rigling, Bush, Shay & Weimer) to file a third-party action against Dauphin Deposit Trust Company (hereinafter “Dauphin”), Main LaFrentz & Company (hereinafter “LaFrentz”). Dechert, Price and Rhoads (hereinafter “De-chert”) and Frederick R. Taylor, Esquire, (hereinafter “Taylor”). The third-party defendants did not oppose this procedure because this would allow them into the ease and thereafter they could file a Motion to Vacate the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McLouth Steel Corp. v. Mesta MacHine Co. Foster v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (Landis Tool Co., Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. McLouth Steel Corp. v. Mesta MacHine Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Goodman v. NeffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Graeff v. Borough of RockledgeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Thompson v. Phillips Equipment & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Muth v. Dechert, Price & RhoadsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Muth v. Dechert, Price & RhoadsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Jagielski v. Package Machine Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Afif v. RMI Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API