Legal Opinion

Jagielski v. Package Machine Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 80-0405PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

Defendant, Package Machine Co. (PMC), moves the Court for an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 14(a) to bring in William H. Schlegel, Inc. (Schlegel) as a third-party defendant. In support of its motion PMC, the manufacturer of the machine which allegedly injured plaintiff, argues that recent discovery shows that Schlegel carelessly maintained and altered the machine. Additionally, since Schlegel is the owner of defendant Poole Engineering Co., Inc. (Poole), it knew of the suit since its inception. Consequently, PMC urges that neither Schlegel nor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Judd v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Delco Wire & Cable Co. v. Keystone Roofing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Oberholtzer v. ScrantonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Thompson v. Phillips Equipment & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Carter v. Anika Manufacturing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bike v. American Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Struss v. Renault U.S.A., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Afif v. RMI Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. United States v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
  5. BATTLE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API