Legal Opinion

Afif v. RMI Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 80-1037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

In January 1979, while working at Fair-Tex Mills, a chemical solution of sodium peroxide which plaintiff’s complaint identified as “Solozone”, exploded causing injuries to plaintiff for which he seeks damages. Defendant, RMI Company (RMI) which allegedly sold the defective product to plaintiff’s employer, joined, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 14(a), Textile Chemicals, Inc. (Textile) asserting that Textile actually supplied the RMI product to Fair-Tex Mills. Textile, moving to dismiss the third-party complaint, argues that it was filed seventeen…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Judd v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Delco Wire & Cable Co. v. Keystone Roofing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Oberholtzer v. ScrantonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Jagielski v. Package Machine Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Thompson v. Phillips Equipment & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Government Development BankDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989
  2. Saunders v. Jim Emes Petroleum Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. BATTLE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API