Legal Opinion
McLouth Steel Corp. v. Mesta MacHine Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 6, 1953No. Civ. A. 12667PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.
The various conflicting claims presented to the Court in this action all arose as the result of an accident in which a roll-grinder, a large and expensive piece of machinery which MeLouth had bought from Landis, the manufacturer, was badly damaged. MeLouth was putting up its new plant at Trenton, Michigan, and had a contract with Mesta, one of the original defendants, under which Mesta agreed to install certain equipment, including the roll-grinder in question. Mesta subcontracted the work of installing the grinder to Foster, the other original defendant. The accident…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Yorkshire Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Welborn v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Ruhlin v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Hardiman v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gogolin & Stelter, Cross-Appellant v. Karn's Auto Imports, Inc., First City Bank, Bellaire, N.A., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Richard Hefley and Kent Martin D/B/A Agri Investment Services v. Harry JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Rea v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- McLouth Steel Corp. v. Mesta MacHine Co. Foster v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (Landis Tool Co., Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.