Legal Opinion
Muth v. Dechert, Price & Rhoads
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 3, 1976No. 74-1931PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN MORGAN DAVIS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this securities fraud case have moved for class action certification under F.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b)(3). The proposed class is identified as follows:
“. . . All those persons who purchased UMIC shares from February 11, 1969 to December 2, 1970, except these defendants and defendants in the related case of Oberholtzer, et al v. Scranton, et al., Civil Action No. 70-3310, and any person who acquired the shares of the defendants in this or the related action.”
As in the aforementioned companion case of Oberholtzer v.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vitiello v. CicconiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- In re Asbestos School LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Piel v. National Semiconductor Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- In re Sumitomo Copper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Sley v. Jamaica Water & Utilities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.