Legal Opinion

Popper v. Broderick

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1899No. S. F. No. 1006PublishedCited by 39 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

At the session of the legislature in 1897 an act was passed, approved March 8th, to regulate the salaries of certain officers of the police department within municipalities of the first class, as follows:

“In every municipality of the first class in this state salaries shall be allowed and paid to the following officers of the police department of such municipality, as in this act provided: To the chief of police, five thousand dollars per annum; To the captain of detectives of the police department, three thousand dollars per annum; To six (6) captains of police, twenty-five hundred dollars…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morton v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kahn v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API