Legal Opinion
People v. Hallner
California Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1954No. Crim. 5627PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Herbert Hallner was charged in three counts of an indictment with having offered bribes to certain officers of the city of Los Angeles in violation of section 67 of the Penal Code. 1 The People have appealed from an order granting Hallner’s motion to set the indictment aside.
The named officers were the president of the hoard of police commissioners, the city attorney and the executive assistant city attorney. It was alleged that Hallner offered the bribes with intent to influence the officials in their “acts, decisions, votes, opinions and proceedings” with respect to certain pending…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.