Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Stringer
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1983No. CA A22578, SC 29107PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
We granted review to consider the applicability of statewide land use planning goals, in this case Goal 3 for agricultural lands, to county land use decisions after Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) acknowledgment of a county’s comprehensive plan and implementing ordinances.
The Polk County Board of Commissioners granted respondents a building permit for a dwelling in conjunction with a farm use. The Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) reversed. LUBA declined to apply the standards set out in the county ordinance for new development on existing lots 1 in the farm/forest (F/F)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Byrd v. StringerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by21 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Ochoco Construction, Inc. v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Friends of Neabeack Hill v. City of PhilomathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Jackson Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.