Legal Opinion
1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 30, 1985No. 83-CONT-111; CA A30016PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of LCDC’s continuance order in its acknowledgment review of the comprehensive plan and land use regulations of the city of Rajneeshpuram.1 LCDC concluded that the city’s plan and regulations comply with Goals 1, 2 and 5 through 13; that the city’s proposal for its urban growth boundary (UGB) satisfies Goal 14 establishment factors (1), (2), (6) and (7) but not factors (3) through (5); and that Goals 3 and 4 are inapplicable in the compliance review.
Petitioners contend initially that LCDC lacked jurisdiction to review or abused its discretion by not deferring review of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benjfran Development, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- City of Damascus v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- City of Rajneeshpuram v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1993