Legal Opinion

Barron v. City Printing Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 28, 1999No. AC 18407PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant insurer Chubb and Son, Inc. (Chubb), appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board), which affirmed the commissioner’s decision to refuse to apportion liability for the plaintiffs claim for benefits. On appeal, Chubb claims that the board improperly (1) denied its claim for apportionment, (2) considered facts outside *87the record in reaching its conclusion that the commissioner had acted reasonably, (3) affirmed the commissioner’s finding of fact concerning the decedent’s exposure to chemicals in the workplace and (4) affirmed the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Black v. London & Egazarian Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Aurora v. Miami Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. DeBarros v. A. L. SingletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Plecity v. George McLachlan Hat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Testone v. C. R. Gibson Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Paternostro v. Arborio Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. McGinty v. Stamford Police Dept.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API