Legal Opinion

Plecity v. George McLachlan Hat Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 14, 1933PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maltbie, C. J,

In this case the commissioner made a pro forma award. Section 5266 of the General Statutes provides that if the commissioner finds that a claim before him involves a doubtful question of law, which the public interest requires should be finally and definitely determined, he may find the facts as in other cases and make his award pro forma; that such an award shall be of the same effect as one in an ordinary case except in certain particulars which are then stated as follows: On the filing of the award the question comes before the Superior Court as though an appeal had been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller Bros. Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Linnane v. Aetna Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Dupre v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Hempfield Township School District v. CavalierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Witchekowski v. Falls Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. COMMERCIAL CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  3. Alloy Surfaces Company v. CicamoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  4. Pizzuto v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. King v. St. Louis Steel Casting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API