Hoyt v. Paulos
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.
The issue in this case involves timeliness, for statute of limitation purposes, of service of summons and complaint on a defendant through service on the Motor Vehicles Division. Do the ORCP provisions concerning mailing of a copy of summons to a defendant’s insurer amend or override ORS 12.020, the statutory definition of when an action is deemed commenced for statute of limitations purposes? Does ORCP 7 D(2)(d), 1 which requires that service of summons be by certified or registered mail, apply to mailing of a copy of a summons and complaint to a defendant’s insurer under ORCP 7 D(4)(a)? 2…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Harp v. LouxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Hoyt v. PaulosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mitchell v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Campos v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Heritage Properties v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Gish v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Hall v. WalrathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.