Gish v. Youngblood

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s judgment of dismissal of his personal injury claim on the ground that defendant had not been adequately or timely served. ORCP 7 (1995). Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that the undisputed facts show that plaintiffs method of service was inadequate and contends that the service satisfied the ORCP 7 D(l) reasonable notice standard. We affirm.

On August 14, 1995, plaintiff and defendant were involved in a motor vehicle accident in Coos County, Oregon. Shortly before the statute of limitations expired, plaintiff filed a complaint…