Legal Opinion

Campos v. Chisholm

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 1991No. A8907-04293; CA A65227PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment that dismissed his claim because of failure adequately to serve defendant with the summons and the complaint within the 2-year Statute of Limitations. ORCP 7. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff and defendant were involved in an automobile accident in August, 1987. At that time, defendant lived in Beaverton. At the accident scene, she gave plaintiff her Beaverton address. In July, 1988, she moved to Aloha and, within 30 days, notified the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) of her new address. She has lived at that address ever since.

On July 28,1989,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Booras v. UyedaOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Jordan v. WiserOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hoyt v. PaulosOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Mitchell v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Levens v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Luyet v. EhrnfeltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Atterbury v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API