Legal Opinion

Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 19, 1988No. 86-1961PublishedCited by 852 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This case involves a provision of Oklahoma’s probate laws requiring claims “arising upon a contract” generally to be presented to the executor or executrix of the estate within two months of the publication of a notice advising creditors of the commencement of probate proceedings. Okla. Stat., Tit. 58, § 333 (1981). The question presented is whether this provision of notice solely by publication satisfies the Due Process Clause.

I

Oklahoma’s Probate Code requires creditors to file claims against an estate within a specified time period, and generally bars untimely claims. Ibid. Such “nonclaim…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by852 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

847 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API