Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
This case involves a provision of Oklahoma’s probate laws requiring claims “arising upon a contract” generally to be presented to the executor or executrix of the estate within two months of the publication of a notice advising creditors of the commencement of probate proceedings. Okla. Stat., Tit. 58, § 333 (1981). The question presented is whether this provision of notice solely by publication satisfies the Due Process Clause.
I
Oklahoma’s Probate Code requires creditors to file claims against an estate within a specified time period, and generally bars untimely claims. Ibid. Such “nonclaim…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by852 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
847 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.