Legal Opinion

Hall v. Walrath

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 1, 1995No. 9102-00838; CA A78477PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendant in this action arising out of an automobile accident. The trial court granted defendant’s motion on the ground that plaintiff had not adequately served defendant pursuant to former ORCP 7D(4)1 or ORCP 7D(1)2 within the period of the statute of limitations. We affirm.

Plaintiff served the Motor Vehicles Division and defendant’s insurer in accordance with ORCP 7D(4), but acknowledges that she did not mail a copy of the summons and complaint to defendant in the manner prescribed by the rule. Plaintiff contends, however, that the insurer should be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mitchell v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Campos v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Atterbury v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Hoyt v. PaulosOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. AlloraDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API