Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Paulos

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 5, 1989No. 86-1204C; CA A44851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment that dismissed her action for damages for personal injuries because she did not timely mail a copy of the summons and complaint to defendant’s insurer by certified, registered or other kind of “receipted mail.” We reverse.

Plaintiff filed her complaint on November 18, 1986, the final day of the two-year period of limitation. ORS 12.110. She alleged that, on November 18,1984, she suffered personal injuries when her vehicle was involved in an accident on a public street with a vehicle that defendant owned and negligently operated. Pursuant to ORCP 7D(4)(a)(i),1…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. PaulosOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Heritage Properties v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Paschall v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Paschall v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API