East Riverside Etc. Dist. v. Holcomb
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. John L. Campbell, Júdge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
—This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The cross-complaint of certain persons who may he designated as Fox and others, and who were brought in as defendants against the objection of plaintiff by order of court, and the findings of the court, are very voluminous and deal with a great many matters which would he difficult to briefly state; hut these matters need not he noticed with any great detail, because, in our opinion, the court erred in allowing the cross-complaint to be filed and in dealing with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Andrews v. Hobson's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- National Fire Insurance Company v. . McKayNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Daniel v. Morrison'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
- Fagan v. BarnesSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
3Cited by10 opinions
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ambassador Petroleum Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.