Baines v. Zuieback
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLEE, J. pro tem.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment for plaintiffs in a suit to reform a sublease.
Plaintiffs are lessees under a written lease made July 24, 1941, for a term of 10 years from September 1, 1941, of improved real property in Long Beach. The lease provides for payment as rental of a sum “equal to seven percent (7%) on all sales and business transacted (as hereinafter defined) by Lessees on the premises, plus seven percent (7%) of any and all rentals received by Lessees from their Sub-Lessees, if any. . . . , ” with a minimum monthly rental of: $450 on October 1, 1941, and for…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Will Flitcroft and Agnes D. Flitcroft v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Maslow v. MaslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Wright v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.