Legal Opinion

Baines v. Zuieback

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1948No. Civ. 15931PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLEE, J. pro tem.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment for plaintiffs in a suit to reform a sublease.

Plaintiffs are lessees under a written lease made July 24, 1941, for a term of 10 years from September 1, 1941, of improved real property in Long Beach. The lease provides for payment as rental of a sum “equal to seven percent (7%) on all sales and business transacted (as hereinafter defined) by Lessees on the premises, plus seven percent (7%) of any and all rentals received by Lessees from their Sub-Lessees, if any. . . . , ” with a minimum monthly rental of: $450 on October 1, 1941, and for…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Will Flitcroft and Agnes D. Flitcroft v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Maslow v. MaslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Wright v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API