Commonwealth v. Kolenda
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This appeal raises the issue of whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request an alibi instruction. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that counsel was not ineffective and we therefore affirm the decision of the Superior Court.
On November 3, 1988, Edward Gibbs was babysitting his nephew in the apartment of his sister, Joan Concannon. The apartment was located on the second floor of 3854 Terrace Street in Philadelphia. Appellant, Zigmont Kolenda, along with his wife and children, lived in the first floor apartment of the building. Gibbs resided in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WhitingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. RoxberrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. MikellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. PirelaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.