Commonwealth v. Roxberry
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
This appeal presents questions as to the circumstances in which a criminal defendant is entitled to an alibi instruction. The sole alibi evidence in this case was appellee’s testimony that he was one-half mile from the scene when the crimes were committed. The trial court gave no alibi instruction. Alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, appellee sought a new trial pursuant to the PCHA, which was denied by the trial court. The Superior Court reversed, granting a new trial. We affirm.
Appellee, Robin S. Roxberry, was charged with kidnapping, rape, IDSI,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WhitingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. BrowdieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.