Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Roxberry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1992No. Appeal 100 W.D. Appeal Docket 1989PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This appeal presents questions as to the circumstances in which a criminal defendant is entitled to an alibi instruction. The sole alibi evidence in this case was appellee’s testimony that he was one-half mile from the scene when the crimes were committed. The trial court gave no alibi instruction. Alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, appellee sought a new trial pursuant to the PCHA, which was denied by the trial court. The Superior Court reversed, granting a new trial. We affirm.

Appellee, Robin S. Roxberry, was charged with kidnapping, rape, IDSI,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. WhitingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. BrowdieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API