Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Durst

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1989No. 39 W.D. Appeal Docket 1988PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

This is an appeal taken by the Commonwealth (Appellant) from the memorandum opinion and per curiam order of the Superior Court which vacated the judgment of sentence imposed on James Durst (Appellee). Appellee was tried and convicted in a non-jury trial before the Honorable Shad Connelly, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, on charges of indecent assault and corruption of minors. Post-trial motions were filed by Appellee and, upon their denial, the trial court imposed a sentence of two and one-half to five years imprisonment on the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. FluhartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API