Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bonomo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1959No. Appeals, 114, 115, 116 and 117PublishedCited by 163 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice McBkide,

The Commonwealth charged that the defendant had carnal knowledge of his niece (Marion Holliday), aged 14, on the 30th of December, 1956, thus resulting in an indictment for incestuous adultery and a separate indictment for statutory rape. A third indictment charged that on May 19, 1957, he contributed to the delinquency of Marion, and a fourth charged the same offense in respect of a young lad, Donald Meier, aged 15. The sufficiency of the evidence has not been attacked and it is unnecessary that we set it forth at length. It is stated in the opinion of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. NewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Commonwealth v. BarnakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Commonwealth v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by163 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Ronald Maurice Stump v. John Bennett, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary, Fort Madison, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API