Legal Opinion

Clements v. Jungert

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1965No. 9651PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a directed verdict against appellants, allowing recovery to respondents on an implied contract for attorneys fees in the sum of $2,025.00, and expenses incurred of $186.40, totaling $2,211.40 and costs.

This action was brought by respondents to recover the reasonable value of their services rendered and expenses incurred in representing appellants in an earlier action entitled, “Charles Mendenhall and Violet Mendenhall, Plaintiffs, vs. Willie Jungert and William Jungert, Jr., Defendants,” Civil Case No. 6069, commenced October 30,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Silbiger v. Prudence Bonds CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Wutchumna Water Co. v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Becht v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. LeighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Continental Forest Products, Inc. v. Chandler Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bailey v. NessIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Fox v. Mountain West Electric, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Harkness v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gardner v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API