Legal Opinion
Sampiere v. Zaretsky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 4, 1992No. 9992PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendants,1 Joel Zaretsky, an allergist, and his medical assistant, Francine Garafolo, appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was awarded $70,000 as against both defendants in a general verdict rendered by a jury. The trial court denied the defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) refused to grant their motion to set aside the verdict which alleged that the plaintiff failed to establish by expert testimony a breach of the standard of care and proximate cause, (2) instructed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Caldor, Inc. v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Farrell v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Madsen v. GatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Criscuolo v. Mauro Motors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Mitchell v. MitchellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- A. V. Giordano Co. v. American Diamond Exchange, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.