Legal Opinion
Madsen v. Gates
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 5, 2004No. AC 23917PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiffs, William A. Madsen and Jacqueline Madsen, appeal from the judgment rendered following the trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside the jury’s verdict. The jury returned its verdict after a trial was held on the negligence action brought by the plaintiffs against the defendants, Michael G. Gates and the town of Enfield (town). The jury found the defendants liable to William Madsen, and awarded him both economic and noneconomic damages, but found that the defendants were not liable to Jacqueline Madsen and returned a verdict in favor of the defendants.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. BeckenbachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sturm v. Harb Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. HindsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Kregos v. StoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Right v. BreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.