Legal Opinion
Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor Control
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 7, 1984No. 12363; 12364; 12077; 12078; 12079PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
The consolidated cases involved in these appeals concern the termination of liquor distributorships. The principal questions raised by these appeals are (1) whether Public Acts 1981, No. 81-367 (act) applies to distributorships in existence prior to the effective date of the act and (2) if so, whether the act as so applied is constitutional. The trial court ruled that the act did not apply and therefore did not reach the constitutional issues. We hold that the act does apply and is constitutional.
The plaintiff Schieffelin & Co. (Schieffelin) is an interstate distributor of liquors and wines,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.