Legal Opinion
Criscuolo v. Mauro Motors, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 4, 2000No. AC 18924PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HEALEY, J.
The defendant, Mauro Motors, Inc., appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Elizabeth Criscuolo, after a trial to the court in this action pertaining to her purchase from the defendant of an allegedly defective used 1992 BMW (vehicle). The plaintiff filed a six count complaint1 seeking, inter alia, damages,2 attorney’s fees and interest. The court *539found the defendant liable only on the first count* * 3 and awarded the plaintiff damages of $10,883.14.4 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) rendered judgment pursuant to a statutory…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Florian v. LengeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Colon v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Spears v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Michalski v. HinzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Caruso v. City of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.