Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Mitchell
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 18, 1993No. 11146PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment, rendered after a court trial, upholding the plaintiffs claim of fraud. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly made legal and factual conclusions that (1) exceeded the scope of the complaint and (2) were unsupported by the evidence and clearly erroneous. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. The plaintiff, Wilfred Mitchell, and his deceased wife are the parents of the defendants, Scott Mitchell and Lynda Maggi. The plaintiff and his wife owned the family residence now in dispute as tenants in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pergament v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Meyers v. Cornwell Quality Tools, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Wise v. Lincoln Logs Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Neri v. NeriConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Daoud v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.