Legal Opinion
Sado v. Israel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 18, 1995No. 90 Civ. 1634 (RO)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs and defendants each move for summary judgment against plaintiff-interve-nor Jeffrey Sado. 1 Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). The non-moving party “cannot escape summary judgment merely by vaguely asserting the existence of some unspecified disputed material facts, or defeat the motion through mere speculation or conjecture.” Western World Ins. Co. v. Stack Oil, Inc., 922 F.2d 118, 121 (2d Cir.1990) (citations…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hollinger International, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- M.H. Segan Ltd. Partnership v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- AM Cosmetics, Inc. v. SolomonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Greenberg v. ChrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Greenberg v. ChrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.