Legal Opinion
Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 1958PublishedCited by 411 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFttld, J.
On this appeal, here on questions certified by the Appellate Division, we are called upon to determine the sufficiency of a complaint in a tort action for damages based on fraud and deceit.
The plaintiff, a manufacturer and processor of aluminum, requires for its business a dependable supply of aluminum ingot in large quantity. The defendant is engaged in the business of selling that metal. The amended complaint states two causes of action.
In the first cause of action, the plaintiff alleges that in April, 1954, the defendant represented that “ its available and uncommitted supplies and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by411 opinions
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch v. Aladdin Capital Management LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Harsco Corp. v. SeguiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
406 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.