Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. Fritzen
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
This appeal, as limited by plaintiff’s brief, relates only to the first cause of action against defendant Barber for conspiracy to divert business opportunities, and to the fifth cause of action against Barber for interference with plaintiff’s claimed contract relationship with defendants Fritzen and Bikoff. It arises out of defendant Barber’s motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 or, in the alternative, for summary judgment under CPLR 3212. We conclude that defendant Barber is entitled to summary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Manning v. . BeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kirch v. Liberty Media Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- Mandelblatt v. Devon Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Kirch v. Liberty Media Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.