Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Chrust
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 10, 2003No. 01 Civ. 10080(RWS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Steven Chrust (“Chrust”) renews a motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Steven A. Greenberg (“Greenberg”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b).
For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Prior Proceedings
This action was commenced on November 14, 2001, by the filing of a complaint alleging causes of action for (1) common law fraud; (2) securities fraud; (3) negligent misrepresentations; and (4) breach of fiduciary duty.
Discovery has been completed, and various motions have been disposed of. See…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Suez Equity Investors, L.P. v. Toronto-Dominion BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. WinnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Moody's Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Pehlivanian v. China Gerui Advanced Materials Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Greenberg v. ChrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.