Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Chrust
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 26, 2002No. 01 CIV. 10080(RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Steven Chrust (“Chrust”) has moved under Rule 12(b)6, Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Steven A. Greenberg (“Greenberg”) and alternatively to strike portions of the complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Prior Proceedings
This action was commenced on November 14, 2001, by the filing of a complaint alleging causes of action for (1) common law fraud; (2) securities fraud; (3) negligent misrepresentations; and (4) breach of fiduciary duty.
The instant motion to dismiss was heard and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Stanley Cohen, Gerald A. Garfinkle, Eastern Artists and Drafting Materials, Inc. v. Elliott Koenig, and Robert KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Paul Stevelman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Alias Research Inc. And Stephen R.B. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- EED HOLDINGS v. Palmer Johnson Acquisition Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Bear, Stearns Funding, Inc. v. Interface Group-Nevada, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Barron Partners, LP v. LAB123, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Greenberg v. ChrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- State Street Bank and Trust Co. v. INVERSIONES ERRAZURIZ LIMIT.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.