Legal Opinion

Weems v. Carter

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1929No. 2743PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge.

In the years 1921 and 1922, Cuatotolapam Sugar Company executed three negotiable notes, two for $10,000 each, and one for <$7,500. One of the $10,000 notes was payable to Berkeley Woolen Company, and the other two notes were payable to Virginia Woolen Company. Payments were made on these notes until the total was reduced to $17,500. One of the appellees, Shirley Carter, a resident of Virginia, acquired all of the notes from the payees.

Contemporaneously with the execution of said notes, appellants, who were plaintiffs below, and who will hero be referred to' as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Robert Y. Brent, Surviving of Robert Brent, Use of the United States v. The President and Directors of the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Clay v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. P. J. Willis & Brother v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Virginia Hot Springs Co. v. McCraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Company and Continental Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Ellen S. Barry v. Honoria Donnelly, William DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Atwater v. RoudebushDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  4. County of Hudson v. JaniszewskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  5. General Petroleum Corp. v. Seaboard Terminals Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API