Legal Opinion

Romero v. Hopewell

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1922No. 2616PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

BRATTON, District Judge.

This suit was instituted by appellant, in the district court of San Miguel county, against W. S. Hopewell as one of the sureties on a certain promissory note dated May 25, 1909, due four months after date, executed by the Pennsylvania Development Company, payable to its own order and by it indorsed in blank. Frank J. Torrance and Arthnr Kennedy were also sureties thereon, the indorsement on the back of the note signed by said sureties being in the following language:

“Por value received we hereby become sureties for the payment of the within note,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Home v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Eickhoff v. EikenbaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co. v. LermuseauxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Yerxa v. RuthruffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Coleman v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Peisker v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. John W. Masury & Son v. Bisbee Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Clay v. Texas-Arizona Motor Freight, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bernstein v. BernsteinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Banbury v. BrailsfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API