Bull v. Coe
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
Suit to foreclose a mortgage. The material facts are as follows:
Charles L. Strong, John 0. Earl, and Alpheus Bull agreed together to purchase and operate a certain mine. Each was to furnish one third of the capital, and be interested in that proportion. Strong had no money, and Bull agreed to advance his share, taking as security a mortgage upon a piece of real property of which Mrs. Strong was the owner, and upon which a homestead had been declared, and taking, also, the title to the mine in his own name as additional security. The mortgage was by a deed absolute in form, duly…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Crater v. . BiningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Mascarel v. RaffourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- M'Broom v. GovernorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1837
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- In re Estate of SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Merced Bank v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Board of County Commissioners v. Security BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.