Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mason

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1895No. 6185PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from the district court of Clay county. Tried', below before Hastings, J. See opinion for references to authorities upon the propositions discussed.

1Opinion of the CourtNor val, C. J.

On the 21st day of August, 1888, the plaintiff and defendant, together with S. M. Lewis and J. E. Hopper, executed a promissory note as sureties for one William Mason, calling for the sum of $1,000, drawing interest at seven per cent from date, payable to the order of Robert Frost’s Sons, and maturing in two years. The principal debtor being insolvent, and having failed to pay the note at maturity, the plaintiff below, Richard J. Mason, paid the same, and on September 9, 1892, brought this action for contribution against his co-surety, A. B. Smith. The petion alleges the execution and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ralston v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Gross v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lord v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Burr v. BoyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1873

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Burrus v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Barton v. Farmers' State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Appleford v. Snake River Mining, Milling & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Eickhoff v. EikenbaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API