Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Zimmer U.S. Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 14, 2011No. CIV. S-08-2944 FCD/EFBPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants Zimmer US, Inc. and Zimmer Inc.’s (“defendants”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and defendants’ motion to exclude the testimony of Martin T. Wells (“Wells”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702. 1 For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and defendants’ motion to exclude Wells’ testimony is DENIED.
BACKGROUND 2
Plaintiff Sara Monroe (“plaintiff’) alleges that use of a Zimmer…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Deutsch Ex Rel. Estate of Deutsch v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Davids v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- In re Heparin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Kildow v. BREG, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Mack v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.