Legal Opinion
Mack v. Stryker Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 14, 2012No. Civ. No. 10-2993 (PAM/JJG)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Stephen Trippel Re “Safety Testing” and State of the Scientific Literature for Notice, and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Limit or Exclude. Defendants’ Experts as Cumulative. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and denies the remaining Motions as moot.
BACKGROUND
A. Mack’s Surgery
Plaintiff Carol Mack had arthroscopic shoulder surgery at Allina Hospital in Fridley, Minnesota on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Prather v. Abbot LaboratoriesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Lewis v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- Huggins v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Carol Mack v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Block v. Woo Young Medical Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.