In re Heparin Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
*719MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.
This multi-district products liability litigation arises out of the manufacture and sale by defendants of contaminated heparin. The plaintiffs allege that the use of contaminated heparin caused a myriad of *720adverse reactions leading to serious injuries and, in some cases, death.
Pending is defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the following categories of claims:
• Claims lacking evidence of any symptoms within sixty minutes of heparin administration;
• Claims alleging heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT);
• Claims alleging…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Contreras v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Allen v. Am. Capital Ltd.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Fernando Rodrigues v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Berbaum v. Amco Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Coblin v. DePuy Orthopaedics IncDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.