Legal Opinion

Primiano v. Cook

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 2010No. 06-15563PublishedCited by 549 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER

ORDER

The opinion filed on March 10, 2010, and appearing at 598 F.3d 558 (9th Cir.2010), is amended as follows:

1. At page 563, after the sentence “We review summary judgment de novo.” and footnote 5, add the sentence “We review rulings on the admissibility of expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 for abuse of discretion.”

2. At page 563, at the end of the newly added sentence, append a new footnote 6 with the following text in the footnote: “Cabrera v. Cordis Corp., 134 F.3d 1418, 1420 (9th Cir.1998).” Renumber the remaining footnotes…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Schneider v. FriedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Clausen v. M/V New CarissaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by549 opinions

  1. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Estate of Henry Barabin v. Astenjohnson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Linda Messick v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Maria Elosu v. Middlefork Ranch IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

544 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API