Legal Opinion
D. S. Kresge Co. v. Ottinger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 8, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The above suits are brought by dealers in eyeglasses to enjoin the enforcement of chapter 379 of the Laws of 1928, amending the Education Law (Consol. Laws, c. 16), so that two of its sections read as follows:
“Sec. 1432-a. Sales of Eyeglasses, Spectacles and Lenses at Retail. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to sell, at retail, as merchandise, in any store or established place of business in the state, any spectacles, eyeglasses, or lenses for the correction of vision, unless a duly licensed physician or duly qualified optometrist,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State v. ZotalisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. State of MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1964
- Stacy Evers v. Herbert A. Buxbaum, T/a Rubin Optical Company, and Dr. Joseph FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Economy Optical Co. v. Kentucky Board of Optometric ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
- Ritholz v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- United States v. State of MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1964