Legal Opinion

State v. Levine

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1928No. 26,381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Convicted of a violation of G. S. 1923, § 5814, as amended by L. 1925, p. 428, c. 339, defendant appeals from the order denying a new trial.

Defendant is a registered pharmacist and owns and conducts a drug store at 800 Washington avenue southeast, Minneapolis. Besides drugs, he has for sale magazines, tobacco, fine stationery, toilet articles, candies, ice cream and soft drinks. He was charged with the violation of a prohibition added to G. S. 1923, § 5814, by L. 1925, p. 428, c. 339, reading: “No person shall hereafter carry on, conduct, or transact business under a name which contains as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. NormandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  2. State v. ZotalisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Cullinan v. TetraultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
  4. Lewis v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Haas v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Agassiz & Odessa Mutual Fire Insurance v. MagnussonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. D. S. Kresge Co. v. OttingerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  4. State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Western Meat, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API