Stacy Evers v. Herbert A. Buxbaum, T/a Rubin Optical Company, and Dr. Joseph Friedman
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
When this suit was brought, appellant’s eyesight had become seriously impaired, with blindness in the right eye, allegedly due to the fault of the appellees. The complaint charged that the appellees, both inaccurately described as optometrists, were negligent in their treatment of the eye condition for which appellant had consulted them in that they failed “to discover and/or timely advise [him] of the presence of a tumor.” A second count, incorporating the allegations of the first count, additionally charged that appellees had represented that appellant needed…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ernest Paroczay v. Luther H. Hodges, Individually and as Secretary of Commerce of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Underwater Storage, Inc. v. United States Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Usv Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare and Commissioner of Food & Drugs, No.24900Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.