Ritholz v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
1Dissent
Plaintiffs own a factory in Chicago and maintain offices or stores throughout the country. They manufacture and fill orders for eyeglasses and the parts thereof. They do business in Detroit under the assumed name of National Optical Stores Company. One of their stores or offices is located in a downtown office building where orders on prescriptions are taken for eyeglasses and frames. These prescriptions from doctors and optometrists are sent to Chicago to be filled. The manufactured articles are forwarded to the Detroit office and, from there, delivered to the customer. Plaintiffs advertised…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Packer Corp. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.