Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ritholz v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1944No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 42,461Published

1Dissent

Plaintiffs own a factory in Chicago and maintain offices or stores throughout the country. They manufacture and fill orders for eyeglasses and the parts thereof. They do business in Detroit under the assumed name of National Optical Stores Company. One of their stores or offices is located in a downtown office building where orders on prescriptions are taken for eyeglasses and frames. These prescriptions from doctors and optometrists are sent to Chicago to be filled. The manufactured articles are forwarded to the Detroit office and, from there, delivered to the customer. Plaintiffs advertised…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Packer Corp. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API