Legal Opinion

Martinez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 22, 1993No. 1 CA-IC 92-0108PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

This is a special action review of an Arizona Industrial Commission award denying reimbursement of travel expenses. One issue is presented: whether the petitioner employee (“Claimant”) should be reimbursed for his travel expenses incurred in obtaining industrially related medical treatment within the locality of his residence or employment. We conclude that the Arizona Workers’ Compensation Act does not provide for the payment of these expenses. Therefore, we affirm the award.

On June 28, 1990, Claimant sustained an industrial back injury while employed as a machinist…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Padilla v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Hughes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Carr v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Drew v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. City of Flagstaff v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API