Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 20, 1996No. 1 CA-IC 95-0058PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

This is a special action review of Arizona Industrial Commission decisions upon hearing and review denying reimbursement of child care expenses. Two issues presented are whether the administrative law judge abused his discretion by deciding this case without testimony from the treating psychiatrist and whether Aiiz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (A.R.S.) § 23-1062(A) extends to child care. Because we find no abuse of discretion and conclude that the statute does not extend to child care, we affirm the decisions upon hearing and review.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In August 1981, petitioner…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grover v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. DOCTORS HOSP., LAKE WORTH v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Arizona Public Service Co. v. Town of Paradise ValleyArizona Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re JULIO LArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Clark v. Deloitte & Touche LLPUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Carbajal v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Coulter v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API