Haggard v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Chief Justice.
Appellants (plaintiffs below) brought an action in behalf of themselves and others similarly situated (class action under the provisions of Sec. 21-524, Arizona Code Annotated, 1939, challenging certain orders of the Arizona Industrial Commission decreeing that certain individuals in and around plaintiffs’ places of business were employees of plaintiffs and insurable as such under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, A.C.A.1939, § 56-901 et seq., at the expense of plaintiffs. From an adverse judgment they prosecute this appeal.
The factual situation out of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Ison v. Western Vegetable DistributorsArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Steward v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Thompson v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Rhode IslandTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. Marana Plantations, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.